Are Interests of Business Actors and Consumers Balanced in The Indonesian Competition Law?
Keywords:Competition Law, Efficiency, Justice
AbstractThis paper aims to provide a critical analysis to the relations between economic efficiency and justice as the objectives of business competition law in Indonesia within the framework of legal philosophy. Philosophical aspects explores view on equal opportunities for every citizen in their business behavior, relation between the principles of justice and efficiency considering that in the Law 5 of 1999 there is no any word “justice” mentioned. Several related schools of legal philosophy will use to analyse the problems, such as, Utilitarianism in dissecting the phrase "public interest and welfare", John Stuart Mill's theory of lliberty in examining "equal opportunities for citizens", The article uses the legal research by emphasising the critical analysis on economic efficiency and justice principles in Indonesian competition law and compare FTC. Article 3 of Law Number 5 of 1999 aims to improve economic efficiency as one of the efforts to improve people's welfare. From a philosophical point of view, people's welfare law is closely related to the "greatest benefit for the greatest people" (Jeremy Bentham). However, if we look at the interests between business actors and consumers, thiscondition can still be seen that the interest in efficiency still prioritizes the interests of business actors. Fulfilment of consumer justice is only placed as an "object" rather than a subject whose rights must be protected due to violations of business competition.
Chaehyeon, Lee, et al. Toward Detecting Illegal Transactions on Bitcoin Using Machine-Learning Methods, International Conference on Blockchain and Trustworthy Systems. Singapore, Springer, 2019.
Harrison, Ross. Jeremy Bentham. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2017.
Hamburger, Joseph. John Stuart Mill on Liberty and Control. United Kingdom, Princeton University Press, 2001.
Jones, B Sufrin. EU Competition Law. United Kingdom, Oxford University Press, 2011.
John Sanghyun, Lee. Strategies to Achieve a Binding International Agreement on Regulating Cartels. Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore, 2016.
Lubis, Andi Fahmi, et al. Hukum Persaingan saha (Buku Teks). Jakarta, Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha, 2017.
Ratnapala, Suri. Jurisprudence. United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Rawls, John. Justice as Fairness. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 1991.
Smith, Adam. The Wealth of Nations in Spain. New York, Routledge, 2022.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Moch Zairul Alam, Kukuh Tejomurti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.