Adaptasi Instrumen Pengukuran Parental Mediation di Indonesia

Bilah Samping Artikel

PDF (English)
Diterbitkan: Aug 1, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.28932/humanitas.v6i2.5204
Kata Kunci:
Parental Mediation, Psychological Measurement, Adapting Mediasi orang tua, instrumen pengukuran, adaptasi

Isi Artikel Utama

Selviana Elisa Sitanggang
Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Indonesia
Eka Riyanti Purboningsih
Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Indonesia
Afra Hafny Noer
Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Indonesia

Abstrak

Parental Mediation menjadi panduan orangtua untuk memediasi penggunaan smartphone dan tablet pada anak.  Penting untuk mengetahui cara orangtua Indonesia menggunakan strategi untuk memediasi penggunaan smartphone dan tablet pada anak.  Alat ukur Parental Mediation telah dikembangkan oleh Nikken & Scholz (2015) namun belum pernah dilakukan proses adaptasi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengadaptasi instrumen pengukuran Parental Mediation yang dikembangkan oleh Nikken & Scholz (2015) dan meninjau properti psikometrinya.  Subjek penelitian adalah 305 orang tua yang memiliki anak usia 2-6 tahun.  Teknik sampling yang digunakan adalah purposive sampling.  Proses adaptasi menggunakan pedoman adaptasi alat ukur dari International Test Commission (2016).  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa instrumen pengukuran yang telah diadaptasi reliabel (α = 0.87) dan valid (GFI= 0.976; RMSEA= 0.034; CFI= 0.986; NFI= 0.948; TLI= 0.983; PNFI= 0.788).  Hasil adaptasi juga menunjukkan bahwa terdapat empat strategi yang digunakan oleh orang tua di Indonesia untuk memediasi penggunaan smartphone dan tablet, yaitu co-use, supervision, active-restrictive mediation dan technical mediation.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Rincian Artikel

Cara Mengutip
Sitanggang, S. E., Purboningsih, E. R., & Noer, A. H. (2022). Adaptasi Instrumen Pengukuran Parental Mediation di Indonesia. Humanitas (Jurnal Psikologi), 6(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.28932/humanitas.v6i2.5204
Terbitan
Vol 6 No 2 (2022)
Bagian
Articles
Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Referensi

Chen, V., & Chng, G. S. (2016). Active and restrictive parental mediation over time: Effects on youths’ self-regulatory competencies and impulsivity. Computers and Education, 98, 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.012

Chen, L., & Shi, J. (2018). Reducing Harm From Media: A Meta-Analysis of Parental Mediation. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018754908

Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Muqarnas (Vol. 8). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.2307/1523157

D.F. Polit; C.T. Beck. (2006). The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What’s Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur

Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric Methods (Second Edition). McGraw-Hills Companies, Inc.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis : Multivariate Data Analysis : Why Multivariate Data Analysis ? Pearson Education, Inc.

Hambleton, R. K., & Zenisky, A. L. (2016). Translating and adapting tests for cross-cultural assessments. Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology, 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779381.004

Hofmeyer, A., Sheingold, B. H., & Taylor, R. (2015). Do You Understand What I Mean? How Cognitive Interviewing Can Strengthen Valid, Reliable Study Instruments And Dissemination Products. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 11(4), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v11i4.9460

Holloway, D., Green, L., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Zero to eight: Young children and their internet use. EU Kids Online, August, 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-137

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D79B73

InternationalTestCommission. (2016). ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition). International Journal of Testing. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166

Jiow, H. J., Lim, S. S., & Lin, J. (2017). Level Up! Refreshing Parental Mediation Theory for Our Digital Media Landscape. Communication Theory, 27(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12109

Johnson, G. M. (2010). Young children’s Internet use at home and school: Patterns and profiles. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(3), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X10379783

Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396

Maria, Ilga & Novianti, R. (2020). The Effects of Using Gadgets during the Covid-19 Pandemic on Children’s Behaviour. Atfaluna: Journal of Islamic Early Childhood Education, 3(2), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.32505/atfaluna.v3i2.1966

Nathanson, A. I. (2001). Parent and Child Perspectives on the Presence and Meaning of Parental Television Mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media Publication, 45(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4502

Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children’s internet use. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(2), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038

Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and Why Parents Guide the Media Use of Young Children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(11), 3423–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4

Pediatrics, A. A. of. (2016). American Pediatric of Academy. https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/American-Academy-of-Pediatrics-Announces-New-Recommendations-for-Childrens-Media-Use.aspx

Robert M. Kaplan & Dennis P. Saccuzzo. (2005). Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications and Issues. Thomson Learning, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004